The #1 Most Misunderstood Real Estate Investment Concept

Posted @ 10:52 pm - Filed under Real Estate Investing, Purposeful Planning, Retirement, Retirement Income, Buying Income Property, Investment Lessons, Goals

It’s the extreme market, Buyer/Seller, it doesn’t matter, in which so many real estate investors either misunderstand foundational concepts, or misapply them, sometimes with uh, unintended consequences of the ‘uh oh’ variety.

Buy Low — Sell High

Seems pretty straight forward, doesn’t it? Not so fast quick-buck breath. :)

Key to profits

As a stand alone proposition, nobody would argue with the concept. But since we all know, some by harsh personal experience, my own included, that investors often buy low and sell lower — there must be a false premise lurking in the shadows.

False Premise — There’s a buyer out there willing to pay your ‘high’ price.

Just ‘cuz you can empirically demonstrate beyond a reasonable doubt you bought way below the current market, there’s absolutely no guarantee whatsoever there will be a buyer out there ready, willing, and able to pay that higher price.

False Premise Since you bought at such a discount, even with an unfavorable market, your incredible coup on the front end will provide a profitable exit on the back end.

Geez, I dunno — ever wondered why you got such a great deal? Sometimes we hit the ‘exacta’ — a very cool discount for a genuinely valuable property. Why do we have such selective memories? Grandma didn’t lie when she told us the old saying ’bout, ‘If it sounds too good to be true, etc.’ Again, it does happen. When it does, count yourself fortunate. Just don’t think ‘cuz you bought so low, your profits are locked in. That’s a fool’s paradise if ever there was one. Life sends enough trains head on at us without creating our own.

train comin' at you

Solution — This answer will surprise some. There is no ‘works every time’ solution. Hence the phrase, ‘risk capital’. You can do your research. You know, the boots on the ground, hands on, no BS research giving you real facts upon which you can reasonably rely. This will, far more often than not, make it highly more likely than not you’ll indeed be able to sell for a capital gain — some time in the future. But the key phrase there is ‘highly more likely than not’.

NOTE: ‘Highly more likely than not’ ‘The sun will set in the west today’. Duh

Those constantly impressed by low prices alone learn quickly they’ve often violated one of the most important rules in existence when it comes to investment.

Value pretty much trumps all. Paying market price for solid value will always outperform a low price for inferior location, product, or any number of other factors involved in the investment decision making process. Gettin’ a discount on real value? Now yer talkin’ podner.

Like an example wouldya?

Josh and I turned an Idaho builder down flat last year when he offered us monster discounts in price, plus a bunch of buyer credits to boot. Why? ‘Cuz he was building a brand new ghetto, that’s why. His construction was a joke. His finished product was an insult to cracker boxes everywhere — no not much hyperbole used. Ever been to what coulda been, shoulda been a great neighborhood, but turned out to be where you could buy a lot of poorly built homes next to a whole bunch of huge families barely making ends meet? I grew up in a neighborhood like that.

Talk about lighting the fuse for a future disaster.

Moral?

Buying low and selling high is the way to go. Just don’t attack your next investment based solely on price, ‘cuz the only way yer gonna come out well, is blind luck. Take it from someone who learned the hard way. :) Buying and selling value is the long term play of choice on Planet BawldGuy.

#1 Takeaway

SL600

Value is almost always best viewed through the eyes of the end user. In residential income property, whether it’s a home, condo, or small multiple units, that user is really two people. During the holding period it’s the tenant. The high quality, long term tenant willing to pay relatively upper range rents, are attracted by perceived value — their perception, not ours.

When you’re ready to sell/exchange the property(s), the end user is either another investor or in the best of all worlds, an owner intending to occupy. If you thought the tenant’s value perception was critical, the volume is significantly cranked up on this one. Another investor or literal end user, wants pure unadulterated value for their money — again, via their perception. If you can offer that, you’ve succeeded in doing exactly what you intended — Bought Low and Sold High.

This is why a Purposeful Plan is so critical as it applies to your retirement goals. Successfully setting up a magnificently abundant retirement is no accident. Contact me to start your Plan. We’ll look at your specific circumstances, and then Plan accordingly.

This entry was posted on Thursday, May 1st, 2008 at 10:52 pm and is filed under Real Estate Investing, Purposeful Planning, Retirement, Retirement Income, Buying Income Property, Investment Lessons, Goals. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

16 comments to “The #1 Most Misunderstood Real Estate Investment Concept”

Ben Bach on May 2nd, 2008 at 5:29 am said:

  • Love the motivation for the Purposeful Plan at the end - I bet there were cheaper options than the SL, but none with as much value

    Be Great

Robert Coté on May 2nd, 2008 at 8:35 am said:

  • …incredible coo…

    Minor nit, “coup” not coo. American Indian practice of touching an opponent and escaping unharmed.

    Enough litterati. I would only add that you’ve not mentioned that other aspect to real estate investing of “adding or providing increased value or service.” If you can provide value with your purchase for someone else willing to pay for it, you need not even sell at all to realize an investment return.

BawldGuy on May 2nd, 2008 at 9:40 am said:

  • Ben — This is why I love putting pictures up on my posts. They so often mean different things to different people.

    I put there to indicate exceptional value. You saw motivation. I’m cool with the double message.

BawldGuy on May 2nd, 2008 at 9:48 am said:

  • Robert — I’ve spelled coup wrong since seventh grade. :) It’s gotta have something to do with a cousin who did a book report once about birds. She ran around for weeks writing and saying the word. Frankly, I never thought birds sounded like they were making ‘coo’ sounds, but she sure did. She always won that argument though with pigeons. She coos now every time we see each other. She’ll be ecstatic to learn I used coo in place of coup. :)

    The American Indian thing? She never did a report on that. :)

    >If you can provide value with your purchase for someone else willing to pay for it, you need not even sell at all to realize an investment return.

    A universal truth. Though I was talking about new stuff, your point is well taken. It’s premised however, on the fact a buyer would want it based upon the value added. You can’t add value to a poor location.

Robert Coté on May 2nd, 2008 at 11:09 am said:

  • As usual we probably won’t disagree after we clarify. Even poor locations are investment opportunities. Our “children” all cannot be above average as in Lake Woebegone. People like Buffet have made their fortunes by recognizing value where other could not. I think of myself as a good landlord (temporarily unemployed) and good renters recognize and place a value on that. Win-win. By fixing the leaky faucet quickly I can ultimately charge a higher rent than the appreciation oriented uninvolved previous owner. Adding value. Strangely, fixing leaks promptly is the cheapest alternative but try and tell a specuvestor that. Generally that added value pays additional dividends on the back end as well but that isn’t the focus or my point.
    [Nomex™ underwear duly donned, flame away] Nah, you be too classy fer that.

BawldGuy on May 2nd, 2008 at 12:19 pm said:

  • You’re right, we don’t disagree. There’s still the underlying implied premise that your rental property was located in an area perceived valuable enough to attract minimally acceptable tenants. Without them your Johnny on the spot policy would become moot.

Robert Coté on May 2nd, 2008 at 12:37 pm said:

  • Yes, of course. I was only uncomfortable with the idea that only the best places were the best places to invest. I’m “Japanese” in this respect. The nail that sticks out gets hammered. I’d rather stay under the radar and avoid either minimal service or max rent attention. My experience is that decent housing at any price level is the ultimate defense.

    That brings up a new twist. Rent regulation can steal our money. I’ll let you comment before I reply.

BawldGuy on May 2nd, 2008 at 12:46 pm said:

  • The concept of rent control or rent regulation is reserved for those of the Marxist persuasion. :) We no doubt agree it’s never a good idea to control the free rental market.

    New York is the stellar example of what happens when it’s applied in its most broad brush/destructive/vindictive manner. There’d be so much more value in NY without rent control, it’s mind boggling just to contemplate.

    Your serve.

Phil Hoover on May 2nd, 2008 at 12:54 pm said:

  • It’s always best to not get “too good” a deal.
    Buying low often = paying more later.
    Now lemme see ~ when did that sun stop coming up in the West, anyway? :)

BawldGuy on May 2nd, 2008 at 1:01 pm said:

  • Readers — Pay attention to Phil, as he’s one of the original Old School dudes I talk about from time to time. Click on his name and check his blog out — you’ll be glad you did.

Denton Ward on May 2nd, 2008 at 2:03 pm said:

  • Buying at a discount is not always a bad thing, because you typically make money on your purchase..right? As well, the investor should understand what they want to accomplish by purchasing the property at a discount, and that will make more sense when it comes time to sell the property.

BawldGuy on May 2nd, 2008 at 2:15 pm said:

  • Denton — You said — Buying at a discount is not always a bad thing, because you typically make money on your purchase..right?

    Sometimes, but not anywhere near always, or even most of the time in this sorta market. I go back to the same question: Why is the seller doing this? ‘Cuz nobody else wanted it, that’s why.

    >…and that will make more sense when it comes time to sell the property.

    That’s if they can sell the property. So often these days, the discount was born of a significantly inferior location, and/or construction quality. Try sellin’ that five years down the road if the public’s perception of the area hasn’t changed.

    Still, as you so correctly pointed out, discounts are not always a bad thing by any stretch. I’m surely with your there. Human nature is so easily lured to real estate’s version of Blue Light Specials on crappola merchandise. :)

Denton Ward on May 2nd, 2008 at 2:23 pm said:

  • Most definitely you have a point. I tend to forget that people purchase on emotion, rather than fundamentals. Using proper real estate fundamentals, people can achieve success with discounted property, and a strategy should be in place as well.

    By the way, how can I sign up for email transmissions of your blog? Having it go straight to my email works best. Thanks!

Ben Bach on May 2nd, 2008 at 2:23 pm said:

  • “Human nature is so easily lured to real estate’s version of Blue Light Specials on crappola merchandise”

    Classic :)

BawldGuy on May 2nd, 2008 at 2:34 pm said:

  • Denton — Right below the comment box is a box you can check to be notified of comments via email.

BawldGuy on May 2nd, 2008 at 2:35 pm said:

  • Ben — Thanks, that’s one in a row. :)

Leave a Reply

Copyright © 2006-2008 Brown and Brown Investment Properties - All Rights Reserved.
WordPress Theme designed by SeanHQ.com