Tax Shelter — Real Estate Investors Should Beware the Professional Investor Trap

Posted @ 11:58 pm - Filed under Real Estate Investing, Check This Out, Investment Lessons, Depreciation, Tax Shelter

The concept as it relates to the Internal Revenue Code is what we’re talking about here. There is an incredible benefit to successfully filing your tax return as a Professional Investor.

It boils down to a simple exemption. Taxpayers owning investment real estate are allowed to use depreciation to ’shelter’ the income generated from their properties. As usual however there’s a hitch. First though, let’s define depreciation from a practical viewpoint.

tax shelter

It is, plain and simple a fantasy loss, what many have termed a phantom loss. The taxpayer gets to claim a fantasy loss which offsets real income. The common phrase used to describe depreciation is tax shelter. Also, once all the property’s income is covered, the remainder, if there’s any depreciation left, is allowed to offset your ordinary (read: day job) income. This results in paying less income taxes. In other words, it’s another form of cash flow.

How cool is that!?

Back to the hitch. The key word here is Tax. Sheltering it or paying it.

Regardless of how much depreciation you as an investor have, the IRC caps its use against your ordinary income at $25,000 annually. Wait, tax  that’s not all. The more you need it, the faster they take it away. Uh, duh, it’s the government. It’s not their job to make us happy. Once your ordinary income exceeds $100,000 they begin decreasing the maximum $25,000 until you get to an income of $150,000 — by which time you’re not allowed any use of depreciation to reduce ordinary income. Don’t be confused here. This limitation applies only to your ordinary income — not the cash flow income from your real estate investments.

The sighs I just heard tells me reality just sunk in for some.

To review — you get $25,000 a year in phantom losses (depreciation) up ’till you make $100,000. It then begins to fade away ’till it’s eliminated from your world at the point your annual income reaches $150,000.

There’s a way to get around it — but it ain’t easy.

All you gotta do is say yer a real estate professional. Once you’ve successfully received the IRS’s blessing as a Pro Investor Dude (Dudette?) the $25,000 limitation is lifted, along with any ordinary income limitations. Let me make as clear as a spring sky in San Diego at noon.

As a Pro Investor you can make an unlimited amount of income and take an unlimited amount of depreciation (phantom losses) against that income.

Wowie wow wow wow. The coolest of the cool.

Got a million bucks in ordinary income and a million bucks in depreciation? Do the math. :)

This doesn’t take into account all the other tax laws that whipsaw us back and forth reminding us why our Forefathers gave us the 2nd Amendment. :) Don’t go around quoting me — check out what I’m saying here with yer own tax guy. This isn’t some hidden or little known factoid I’m trotting out here. That said, just like the Alternative Minimum Tax has for years taken away much of what the rest of the IRC gives — ensure you’re acting with complete confidence and massive professional expertise behind you.

If you need a referral, I’ll try and help you out with one.

sunset

The IRS has a whole bunch of tests to see if you qualify for the designation. I’m a full time real estate broker which some would say is the gold standard. Nobody qualifies easier than a full time real estate broker who also owns his own real estate investment firm. The only bet safer than that is the sun setting in the west. :)

The trap is set when folks see this as an easy workaround for tax reduction. That is a stainless steel bear trap that will cause IRS pain you don’t want in your life. Take my word here — talk with your tax advisor to see if you might qualify for this. If you claim this designation and it’s disallowed, you’ll wish you’d stepped in a bear trap instead.

I currently deal with many clients who’ve successfully cleared all the IRC hurdles for this coveted designation. Here’s one example.

He was an attorney — quit his job to become an investor — and now he’s a recovering attorney. :) He easily passes the required tests and has qualified to file his tax returns as a Professional Investor for years now. It’s made a pretty big difference in his life — especially around the middle of each April.

A final note

The motivation for this post was the recent proliferation of so called ‘advisors’ who were counseling bear trapfolks to claim the designation while kinda sorta telling them to seek expert advise or consultation. By the fourth or fifth time I read one of these hacks I felt this post was necessary.

Go ahead and explore the subject with a CPA or tax attorney — it’s worth a try.

Please, as a favor to me and yourself, don’t read somebody’s claims on the internet and go for it. Those bear traps are as nasty as they appear to be.

This entry was posted on Friday, February 22nd, 2008 at 11:58 pm and is filed under Real Estate Investing, Check This Out, Investment Lessons, Depreciation, Tax Shelter. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

20 comments to “Tax Shelter — Real Estate Investors Should Beware the Professional Investor Trap”

Sean Purcell on February 23rd, 2008 at 6:56 am said:

  • I have read those same posts and often wondered how ligit the whole “professional investor” designation was.

    Can you share a few general thoughts (or experience) on what some of the hurdles are to claiming the designation? I promise to only list you as my advisor when I file my taxes this year. :)

Tax Shelter - Real Estate Investors Should Beware the Professional Investor Trap | The Long List of Odysseus Medal Nominees | Realtors and real estate, mortgages, lending, investments on February 23rd, 2008 at 8:50 am said:

  • […] Tax Shelter - Real Estate Investors Should Beware the Professional Investor Trap, by Jeff Brown. […]

BawldGuy on February 23rd, 2008 at 12:16 pm said:

  • Sean — I was gonna publish a link to the IRC section dealing with the qualifications. The problem was the typical mind numbing language which did more in my opinion to confuse than elucidate.

    After listening to a couple CPA’s and a real estate attorney, there was enough gray areas to scare even the bravest Tarzans in the jungle. :)

    In a nutshell there are requirements for work hours per year, certain tasks, professions, etc.

    Then, if you pass one test, but fail another you might be able to go forward, or not. Aarrggghh!!

    About 50% of the tests result in slam dunk surety — the rest? Flip a coin and hope it doesn’t land on BEAR TRAP. :)

Chris Lengquist on February 24th, 2008 at 9:15 am said:

  • As with so many things “intent” has to be taken into account when it comes to the IRS.

    The rules are clearly (don’t laugh) spelled out. But if you fall 2 hrs short does it really matter?

    But you better be sure of your stance. Great post.

Sunday Real Estate Wrap-Up | Real Estate Investing for Real Blog on February 24th, 2008 at 12:33 pm said:

  • […] Tax Shelter — Real Estate Investors Should Beware the Professional Investor Trap - The BawldGuy Talking blog presents a very thorough post that discusses the “benefit to successfully filing your tax return as a Professional Investor.” This is a Must Read! […]

Lee Birnbaum on March 25th, 2008 at 12:21 pm said:

  • Hi. I have been reading and reading and listening to tapes, etc, and still can not verify if something very critical that someone told me is true or not.

    Basically, I was told that if you DO designate yourself as a real estate professional, then later when you sell your investment property, it will NOT qwualify for long term capitol gains, but rather, all profit will be taxed as income, no matter how long you owned it.

    If this is true, it makes the realestate pro potentially a very BAD choice.
    Imagine if you bought a property at a deep discount, and sell 5 years later. Being taxed onthe profit at full income level can way overshadow the short term benefits you received from the RE Prof designation over the 3 year period –No?
    Am I missing something? Please comment.

    Thanks
    Lee

BawldGuy on March 25th, 2008 at 12:59 pm said:

  • Lee — Thanks for the question, as it uncovers a common misunderstanding I run into from time to time.

    The mistake is between ‘professional investor’ and ‘dealer’.

    A dealer is treated pretty much like someone buying and selling cars for a profit.

    The ‘pro investor’ however is treated just like any other long term investor. When they wish to execute a tax deferred exchange, they simply do so.

    A client is in the middle of an exchange as we speak, and he’s been a pro investor for several years now.

    Ironically he used to be a buy/rehab/sell kinda guy and did pay the less attractive tax rates. There are investors who actually do both, but must be very careful to separate each operation.

    You’ve apparently mistaken a dealer for a professional investor.

    Make sense?

Lee Birnbaum on March 25th, 2008 at 4:00 pm said:

  • THanks so much for the reponse.

    I am trying to understand, except, you mention a tax deferred exchange (I assume a 1031 exchange for example…).

    Specifically, my question relates to final disposition of the property (not an exchange).

    Anotherwords, if I hold the property more than 1 year, I would expect to enjoy only 15% capitol gains tax on the profit fromt he sale.

    But If I am designated as a real “estate professional” (not dealer), can I still enjoy the 15% long term gains rate, or will the sale profit be calssified as income (e.g. short term rate)?

    WHen you say, “hhe ‘pro investor’ however is treated just like any other long term investor”, perhaps you are already answering my question in that I CAN enjoy the 15% gains rate (as a non-real estate pro long term investor would). But if you don’t mind, please clarify so I am clear on this important detail.

    THanks Again –Lee

BawldGuy on March 25th, 2008 at 6:48 pm said:

  • Lee - You asked — In other words, if I hold the property more than 1 year, I would expect to enjoy only 15% capitol gains tax on the profit from the sale?

    The short answer is yes. The professional investor has already demonstrated their intent, that is, they’re investing long term.

    Therefore, if they choose to sell after the appropriate holding period, they’re be taxed using long term capital gains rates. The dealer of course will not, as they’ll be taxed as if it was ‘ordinary’
    (job) income.

    Check with your CPA to ensure you’ve been acting like a long term investor. Boiled down, that simply means you don’t have a trail of short term buy lows and sell highs streaming behind you. :)

    If you need some professional advice, I can point you to someone who will give you expert assistance.

    Hope this has helped.

Lee Birnbaum on March 26th, 2008 at 12:25 am said:

  • THanks , I do appreciate the quick response, and this sounds like great news!

    Only, in reading your response, I guess there’s just 1 more thing I appear to be unclear on…

    Can you briefly explain the difference (if any) between “Professional Investor” (which you refer to) and “Real Estate Professional”?

    The designation I was considering was “Real Estate Professional”, not “Professional Investor” (which I was not familiar with until today).

    Also, I believe you mentioned that you can refer me to a tax professional/expert in this area. I might be interested in such services.
    I am in the Dallas Tx area if you have a referral to share.

    Thanks again
    Lee

Jeff Brown on March 26th, 2008 at 9:31 am said:

  • Lee — There’s no difference — it’s me being tired and using poor language. Whatever you call it, as long as you aren’t including the word ‘dealer’ you’ll be fine.

    The phrase commonly used is Professional Investor. I’m a real estate professional, i.e. licensed real estate broker. One is used by the IRS while the other is not.

Lee on April 2nd, 2008 at 9:31 am said:

  • Thanks again for all the info.

    It has definiotely helped.

    I think I’m going to try read through IRS Pubs 550 (Investment Income and Expenses) and 527 (Residential Rental Property) to learn as much as I can comprehend on the subject in general.

    -Lee

BawldGuy on April 2nd, 2008 at 9:49 am said:

  • Lee — Also, check 1231.

    The main thing is doing things on Purpose, right?

Lee on April 2nd, 2008 at 9:57 am said:

  • Ummm… searching the IRS site, it looks like “section 1231 gain or loss” is best outlined for my purposes in IRS Publication 544.
    Sound correct?

    -thx

BawldGuy on April 2nd, 2008 at 10:07 am said:

  • Yes, but I usually recommend folks get a comfortable understanding of the various code sections (for those who don’t have enough pain in their lives) :) in a ’stand alone’ fashion. IRS publications can sometimes be fast and loose with ’sections’ and other words and concepts when they’re writing in a larger context.

    In case you don’t have the pdf of 544 for 2007 taxes, here’s a link for you. Don’t forget the Bayer. :)

    http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-pdf/p544.pdf

Sam on April 24th, 2008 at 1:49 am said:

  • Being a real estate agent is not as reliable as the setting sun. The IRS can and will disallow all hours as an agent for real estate professional under audit, an auditor told me this and I have seen it happen. If you do this prepare to appeal and potentially go to tax court.

    Also, the hours to meet the professional status have to be in a business which you materially participate.

    If anyone out there has had audits turn out differently, please post a response to this.

BawldGuy on April 24th, 2008 at 12:27 pm said:

  • Sam — I agree with you, but only in the sense of the time. When I said that I meant the agent was full time in the business, and made their living doing that work.

    The gold standard is a full time agent in the business, making a living — easily documented for hours etc.

    I’ve never been challenged, nor has anyone I know, and there are plenty. Moreover, a few of my clients who’ve successfully made this happen, have never been challenged either. But then they documented everything from Day 1.

    The main client is a retired attorney who had spoken with the IRS on this subject before he took the leap to professional investor.

    It’s now been seven returns without a peep.

    I don’t know what else to tell you.

MARIA on August 8th, 2008 at 1:27 am said:

  • HI, I’M A REAL ESTATE INVESTOR AND I AM TRYING TO REFINANCE A COUPLE OF MY RENTAL PROPERTIES. THE PROBLEM IS THAT THE AJUSTED GROSS INCOME ON MY TAX RETURN IS VERY LOW BECAUSE OF THE DEPRECIATION TO OFFSET THE INCOME. HOW CAN I PREPARE MY TAX RETURN SO THAT IT’S MORE APPEALING TO A BANK, YET STILL REDUCE MY TAXABLE INCOME? PLEASE ADVISE. THANKS!

Sean Purcell on August 8th, 2008 at 11:22 am said:

  • Maria,

    We would need to take a look at your tax returns and see what is really going on, but generally we can add the depreciation back into your gross income for loan purposes.

    Hope that helps. Feel free to email directly if I can answer further questions.

BawldGuy on August 8th, 2008 at 11:28 am said:

  • Maria — I know Sean personally, and he’s the real deal. I asked him to come here and answer you personally.

    He has the official BawldGuy Seal of Approval.

    He’s also smarter than the average bear. :)

Leave a Reply

Copyright © 2006-2008 Brown and Brown Investment Properties - All Rights Reserved.
WordPress Theme designed by 1158pm.com