Mainstream Media Predicts 11 of the last 4 Recessions — San Diego Income Property Owners

Posted @ 12:01 am - Filed under 1031 Exchanges, Sez Me, Real Estate Markets, Economy, Physics of Economics, BawldGuy Axiom, Definitions

This is yet another recession predicted for nearly a year that hasn’t materialized. MSM (mainstream media) is desperate to create the perception if they can’t report the reality. This time they’ve even gone as far as using the ‘D’ word, depression. ‘Course they’ve backed of that bit of unintentional comedy, as in the six months or so since they first used it, they can’t even coax a recession to appear.

Does this mean there won’t be one? Hardly. But I’d ask you to consider a couple facts.

1. Recessions can be pinpointed as to their beginning and end only through the rearview mirror. Time passes and we’re able to look at the numbers which indicate a recession has begun — or in the case of the last seven years or so — hasn’t begun.

2. Recessions are like pregnancy, at least in concept. You are either in a recession or you are not. Ever met a woman who was kinda sorta pregnant? Me neither.

Rocket Science

But enough. The point is simple: The reality of a recession’s existence isn’t open to debate. It has a finite, and long accepted definition which ain’t rocket science, regardless of what MSM would have readers believe. Simply put: Two consecutive quarters of negative GDP growth. When that happens a recession exists. If it ever happens this year or next, you’ll know. The headlines in the MSM will probably be in four inch tall, bolded fonts.

BawldGuy Axiom: The Physics of Economics are what they are. No amount of debate will affect change, any more than debating the earth’s shape, flat or round, is worthy of one expended calorie.

Sensitive to San Diego income property owners, I feel their pain. What I offer you as a local real estate investor is objectivity. Amateur, professional, we all find ourselves too close to make good decisions at times. Yesterday’s post generated a comment from a very sophisticated investor, who visits here often. We agree and disagree depending upon the subject. Often times our disagreement is, to be kind, splitting some fairly thin hair. Commenting on San Diegans who insist on keeping their equity here, and while using the ‘early bird and the worm’ lessons, he wrote:

Be the bird, sure but sometimes the fat worms are the lazy ones that sleep in. The analogy here is that IMO (in my opinion) we haven’t seen the amateur investors entirely flushed out yet at the same time the amateur sellers, those who shoulda got outta Dodge are still waiting (and waiting) for the market to turn.

Though I’m sure the term used by the commenter, ‘amateur’, rankles many, the Lone man in the desertsentiment is right on. Though my opinion, i.e., San Diego income property will not again perform near the level of competing regions, falls short of axiomatic, it surely is a widely held opinion. More plainly put, I’m not some lonely voice in the desert, hoping someone listens and believes. There are many who’ve regretted not heeding my pleas to exchange their equities to other states. For some it’s too late, but for the vast majority a tax deferred exchange from San Diego to superior regions would be hugely beneficial, and an obvious improvement of their status quo, bringing immediate and positive impact.

If the only thing you do is explore this with me in one conversation, at least you’ll have heard what’s possible for your particular set of circumstances. Then you’ll be able to truly make an informed decision in your best interests. So there it is. Call or email me. I’m available all the time, ‘cuz I’ve designed it that way. Contact me through the blog here. Or, just nudge me at jeff@brownandbrowninc.com. My clients will tell you I respond very quickly. More than half the time you’ll get a reply in 30 minutes or less. Almost never does it take longer than a few hours.

OK, enough real estate — it’s Friday! Time for tunes. Been thinking about my little girl today. She’s gonna ‘walk’ next spring — get her degree. Seems like a couple years ago she was hoppin’ on my lap and puttin’ her head on my shoulder at night, or complaining ’bout having to go to big brother’s Little League games.

Jamie Geiger, a way cool Phoenix real estate agent, answered a call for help with a suggestion to try out one of her favorite artists. Works for me, Jamie. Thanks again.

This entry was posted on Saturday, July 19th, 2008 at 12:01 am and is filed under 1031 Exchanges, Sez Me, Real Estate Markets, Economy, Physics of Economics, BawldGuy Axiom, Definitions. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

9 comments to “Mainstream Media Predicts 11 of the last 4 Recessions — San Diego Income Property Owners”

Robert Coté on July 19th, 2008 at 6:53 am said:

  • It never occurred to me that “amateur” might rankle. I’ll try harder to be less provocative. Its possible to be a pro right from the start. Tiger Woods is an example. Most of us have to win a few and lose a lot before turning pro. That doesn’t mean we were ever bad as amateurs. I think what rankles is that the recent bubble managed to paper over some real boneheaded investor decisions that ended up making money anyway thus giving participants the false impression that it was their expertise that was the cause. Those kinds of people don’t want to learn they aren’t good merely lucky. And don’t think professional is any honor to hang on the wall as the LA Times story about a flipper couple attests.
    http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-homesales17-2008jul17,0,3250369.story
    http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/laland/2008/07/theyre-back-ret.html
    For some reason these sucessful flippers failed both a foreclosure and bankruptcy as part of their program.

    Now the part you don’t like, corrections. The NBER does not define recession as two or more negative quarters. From their 2003 publication:

    http://www.nber.org/cycles/recessions.html

BawldGuy on July 19th, 2008 at 9:59 am said:

  • Geez Robert, as if I don’t hafta read enough every day. :)

    I don’t mind you bringing up NBER. Their formula/definition of recession hasn’t been adopted for even narrow use ‘cuz if it was, we’d have had far more recessions than we already do.

    A boom is over, and things settle down — BOOM! — it’s a recession. MSM would love, does love NBER’s definition. Their problem is they can’t sell that definition in their stories. Even the NY Times can’t get that by the ’smell test’.

    That’s not to say NBER isn’t credible, far from it. But when something as important to the nation’s perception as the definition of recession is largely based on subjective judgment — it’s just not gonna be accepted.

    All that said? I think you and I will agree on the main concept here. No, there hasn’t been a recession based upon objective criteria, i.e., the two quarters approach. But has the economy been teasin’ us for the last several months? Yep. Have many respected economists predicted recession? Yep.

    In the end, Robert, the nation’s economy still hasn’t hit that point yet. It might, but that little spot in the back of my brain hasn’t started vibratin’ yet.

    The rest is fuel for debate on subjective criteria — at least it is if one is gonna be objective. :)

    Love ya man.

BawldGuy on July 19th, 2008 at 10:04 am said:

  • As far as the term ‘amateur’ rankling some, I speak from experience. Human nature dictates investment failure is never their doing. Therefore calling themselves amateurs isn’t an option for many.

    On the other hand, the overwhelming majority of folks who join Brown and Brown as clients begin by declaring their amateur status with an easily discernible tone of relief in their voices.

    They’d prefer making decisions objectively, and after careful analysis.

Joshua on July 19th, 2008 at 3:56 pm said:

  • Congrats to your daughter! One of my favorite songs!

Todd Tarson on July 20th, 2008 at 8:34 am said:

  • Normally when I go see a movie with a person who has already seen the same movie, but wants to see it again, I let them know that they are not to speak to me during said movie.

    However, Jeff, this movie is different. I never really paid much attention to this genre before. I was too busy living the good (single) life in Vegas and issues like the economy… well… lets just say words like economy only meant something if a dash separated that word and ’sized’ for instance (especially at the liquor store).

    I just want to thank you a bit for letting a couple of the cats out of the bag so far (whether here or at my site in the comments). Very much appreciated by me… and it makes me appreciate this movie more than I think it normally would.

    A classic action movie came out 20 years ago called Die Hard (I think some have heard of it). Well there was a character in that movie named Richard Thornberg and he represented the media. The character was played by William Atherton and I truly hope he gets the role for this ‘movie’ as well… as we all know what happens to the character at the end.

Jeff Brown on July 20th, 2008 at 11:29 am said:

  • Thanks so much, Todd. Atherton nailed that part.
    Problem is, there are so many media folk who are perfect to play it. :)

Todd Tarson on July 20th, 2008 at 12:04 pm said:

  • I don’t think it is that big of a problem as there’s plenty of folks that would line up to play the Bonnie Bedelia part at the end.

BawldGuy on July 20th, 2008 at 12:11 pm said:

  • LOL Millions for sure.

David Shafer on July 21st, 2008 at 2:09 pm said:

  • Much of the argument over whether a recession or not is simply straw men argument. Here is what we know for sure. The economy cycles up and back down. The overall pattern is slowly rising as a whole. For sub-sets within the whole it is a different story as there are real winners and losers (the middle class is currently on the losing end). The arguments should be about the intensity of the ups and downs, not their existence. The Fed’s for all its mistakes attempts to keep the intensity of the cycles down. Capital, because it can adjust quickly, wants higher intensity. Workers prefer more stability. Politicians pander to capital, hoping the economy goes straight up without the inevitable down cycle and then attempts to “cool out” the workers during the down cycle. We are coming off a very intense up cycle. So what do you think the down cycle will look like?

Leave a Reply

Copyright © 2006-2009 Brown and Brown Investment Properties - All Rights Reserved.
WordPress Theme designed by SeanHQ.com